1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 148 P.3d
  5. 148 P.3d 1112 (2006)
 

STATE v. WATKINS

No. 56507-9-I.

148 P.3d 1112 (2006)

STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Jermaine Devon WATKINS, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

December 18, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Christopher Gibson, Nielsen Broman & Koch PLLC, Seattle, Valerie Marushige, Attorney at Law, Des Moines, Counsel for Appellants.

Scott Frederick Leist, King County Prosecuting Atty Office, Seattle, Counsel for Respondents.

PUBLISHED IN PART

COX, J.

¶ 1 Jury instructions must more than adequately convey the law. They must make the relevant legal standard "manifestly apparent to the average juror."1 Here, the unanimity instruction given to the jury arguably does not meet this standard. But we are bound by precedent from the supreme court that expressly approves the unanimity instruction given in this case. Accordingly, we must reject the argument...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases