1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 902 A.2d
  5. 902 A.2d 352 (2006)
 

NOTTE v. MERCHANTS MUT. INS. CO.

902 A.2d 352 (2006)

386 N.J. Super. 623

Theresa M. NOTTE and Robert Pantano, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MERCHANTS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and William F. Wolfe, Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 25, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Zatuchni & Associates, attorneys for appellants (David Zatuchni, Princeton, on the brief).

Sweeny & Sheehan, John M. Monahan, Three Bridges, (Jaeckle, Fleischman & Mugel) of the New York bar, admitted pro hac vice, attorneys for respondent, Merchants Mutual Insurance Company (Guy Mercogliano and Mr. Monahan, on the brief).

Wolf, Block, Schorr and Solis-Cohen, attorneys for respondent, William F. Wolfe (Louis L. Chodoff, Cherry Hill, on the brief).

Before Judges STERN, PARRILLO and GRALL.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

PARRILLO, J.A.D.

On remand from the Supreme Court, Notte v. Merchs. Mut. Ins. Co., 185 N.J. 490, 888 A.2d 464 (2006), we have been asked to determine whether granting plaintiff's request for leave to amend his complaint to replead his time-barred claims under the Conscientious Employee Protection Act...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases