IN RE GILMAN

No. 95,133.

280 Kan. 962 (2006)

In the Matter of DAVID R. GILMAN, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Kansas.

Opinion filed February 3, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank D. Diehl, deputy disciplinary administrator, argued the cause, and Stanton A. Hazlett, disciplinary administrator, was with him on the formal complaint for petitioner.

Steven R. McConnell, of McConnell & McMahon, argued the cause for respondent, and David R. Gilman, respondent, argued the cause pro se.


Per Curiam:

This is an original proceeding in discipline filed by the office of the Disciplinary Administrator against David R. Gilman, of Overland Park, an attorney admitted to the practice of law in Kansas. The formal complaint filed against the Respondent alleged violations of KRPC 8.4(d) (2005 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 504) (misconduct); KRPC 3.4(d) (2005 Kan. Ct. R. Annot 467) (fairness to opposing party and counsel); KRPC 3.5(c) (2005 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 471...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases