BOARD OF EDUCATION OF TALBOT CTY. v. HEISTER

No. 56, September Term, 2005.

896 A.2d 342 (2006)

392 Md. 140

BOARD OF EDUCATION OF TALBOT COUNTY, Maryland v. James D. HEISTER, et al.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

April 13, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Douglas A. Collison (Kopen & Collison, LLP, Easton, on brief), for appellant.

James R. Whattam (Maryland State Teachers Assn. of Annapolis, on brief), for appellees.

Argued before BELL, C.J., RAKER, WILNER, CATHELL, HARRELL, BATTAGLIA and GREENE, JJ.


HARRELL, J.

We consider here whether a contractual provision included in all employment contracts for primary and secondary public school teachers in the State of Maryland (as required specifically by the Code of Maryland Regulations (COMAR)), providing that, in the case of breach, "salary already accrued will be forfeited, in the discretion of the Local Board of Education," is a valid and enforceable liquidated damages clause or an unenforceable penalty.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases