MINNESOTA CENTER v. ST. PAUL PARK

No. A05-1029.

711 N.W.2d 526 (2006)

MINNESOTA CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ADVOCACY, Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. PAUL PARK, Respondent, R. Gordon Nesvig, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

April 4, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Janette K. Brimmer, James L. Erkel, Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy, St. Paul, MN, for appellant.

George C. Hoff, Amanda K. Morken, Hoff, Barry & Kuderer, P.A., Eden Prairie, MN, for respondent City of St. Paul Park.

Laurie J. Miller, Richard D. Snyder, Debra A. Schneider, Fredrickson & Byron, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for respondents Nesvig, et al.

Mike Hatch, Attorney General, David P. Iverson, Assistant Attorney General, St. Paul, MN, for amicus curiae Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.

Considered and decided by LANSING, Presiding Judge; SHUMAKER, Judge; and HALBROOKS, Judge.


OPINION

SHUMAKER, Judge.

Respondent City of St. Paul Park, serving as the responsible governmental unit for purposes of environmental review, adopted an alternative urban area-wide review (AUAR) assessing the environmental impact of a proposed development of respondent R. Gordon Nesvig's property. Appellant Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy (MCEA) filed a complaint contending that the final AUAR was inadequate. The district court granted respondents...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases