1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 445 F.Supp.2d
  5. 445 F.Supp.2d 792 (2006)
 

ARDINGO v. POTTER

No. 1:04-CV-835.

445 F.Supp.2d 792 (2006)

Charles ARDINGO, Plaintiff, v. Robert POTTER and United Food & Commercial Workers, Local 951, Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division.

August 8, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Henry L. Guikema, Henry L. Guikema, P.C., Joel E. Krissoff, Farr, Oosterhouse & Krissoff, Grand Rapids, MI, for Plaintiff.

Jonathan D. Karmel, Mindy L. Kallus, Karmel & Gilden, Chicago, IL, for Defendants.

OPINION

ENSLEN, Senior District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Defendants Robert Potter and United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 951's ("Union") Motion for Summary Judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c). The Motion has been fully briefed and the Court discerns no reason to hear oral argument. W.D. LCIVR 7.2(d). For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant in part and deny in part Defendants' Motion.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases