1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 714 N.W.2d
  5. 714 N.W.2d 512 (2006)
 

MATTER OF DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST MANDELMAN

Nos. 2003AP3348-D, 2004AP2633-D.

714 N.W.2d 512 (2006)

2006 WI 45

In the Matter of DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST Michael D. MANDELMAN, Attorney at Law. Office of Lawyer Regulation, Complainant-Respondent-Cross-Appellant, v. Michael D. Mandelman, Respondent-Appellant-Cross-Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided May 17, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the respondent-appellant-cross-respondent there were briefs by Daniel W. Hildebrand and DeWitt Ross & Stevens S.C., Madison, and oral argument by Daniel W. Hildebrand.

For the complainant-respondent-cross-appellant, there were briefs by Robert G. Krohn and Roethe Krohn Pope L.L.P., Edgerton, and oral argument by Robert G. Krohn.

¶ 1 PER CURIAM.

Attorney Michael D. Mandelman has appealed that portion of a referee's report finding that the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) proved by clear, satisfactory, and convincing evidence that Attorney Mandelman engaged in misconduct with respect to his representation of five clients. The OLR has cross-appealed the referee's findings and conclusion with respect to one of the counts as to which the referee found the OLR had not met its burden of proof...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases