1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 901 A.2d
  5. 901 A.2d 322 (2006)
 

FELDMAN v. HUNTERDON RADIOLOGICAL ASSOC.

901 A.2d 322 (2006)

187 N.J. 228

Ruth S. FELDMAN, M.D., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. HUNTERDON RADIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES and Mark S. Malzberg, individually, Defendants-Appellants, and The Brems Imaging Group II, LLC and The Brems Imaging Group, LLC, Defendants-Respondents.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided July 5, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John H. Schmidt, Jr., Westfield, argued the cause for appellants (Lindabury, McCormick & Estabrook, attorneys; Mr. Schmidt and Kathleen M. Connelly, on the brief).

William J. Caldwell, Clinton, argued the cause for respondent Ruth S. Feldman, M.D. (Carter, Van Rensselaer and Caldwell, attorneys).

Sharon H. Moore, Clinton, submitted a letter in lieu of brief on behalf of respondents The Brems Imaging Group II, LLC and The Brems Imaging Group, LLC (Gebhardt & Kiefer, attorneys).

Justice LONG delivered the opinion of the Court.

Plaintiff, Ruth Feldman, a physician and a shareholder-director of Hunterdon Radiological Associates (HRA), filed a complaint against HRA alleging, among other things, a violation of the Conscientious Employee Protection Act (CEPA), N.J.S.A. 34:19-1 to -8. She contended that HRA first marginalized and then constructively discharged her as a result of her attempt to remedy...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases