INFINITY BROADCASTING CORP. v. NEW JERSEY MEADOWLANDS COMM'N


901 A.2d 312 (2006)

187 N.J. 212

INFINITY BROADCASTING CORPORATION; and Inner City Broadcasting Corporation, Appellants-Respondents, v. NEW JERSEY MEADOWLANDS COMMISSION, Defendant-Appellant, and EnCap Golf Holdings, LLC., Intervenor-Respondent.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 27, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Valerie W. Haynes, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant (Nancy Kaplen, Acting Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Michael J. Haas, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel).

Gregory J. Bevelock argued the cause for intervenor-respondent (DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Wisler, attorneys; Eric D. Wisler, Teaneck, of counsel).

Kenneth D. McPherson, Jr. argued the cause for respondents (Waters, McPherson, McNeill, attorneys; Mr. McPherson and Eric D. McCullough, Secaucus, on the briefs).


Justice RIVERA-SOTO delivered the opinion of the Court.

This appeal requires that we address the question whether an appeal from a decision of the New Jersey Meadowlands Commission (Meadowlands Commission)1 lies directly in the Appellate Division of the Superior Court or in an action in lieu of prerogative writs in the Law Division of the Superior Court. Distinguishing actions challenging the Meadowlands Commission's adoption of amendments...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases