EWIN v. BURNHAM

Docket No. 259180.

728 N.W.2d 463 (2006)

272 Mich. App. 253

Christopher EWIN, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Thomas BURNHAM, Respondent-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Michigan.

Decided September 12, 2006, at 9:05 a.m.

Released for Publication December 27, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. (by David D. O'Brien), Ann Arbor, for the petitioner.

Faupel & Associates (by Paul C. Fessler and Marian L. Faupel), Ann Arbor, for the respondent.

Before: SAWYER, P.J., and FITZGERALD and O'CONNELL, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

Respondent appeals as of right the November 1, 2004, order of the trial court, which denied his motion to quash a subpoena and mandated his appearance for a deposition. We affirm.

Respondent received a subpoena to appear for a deposition in Michigan regarding matters stemming from a presuit discovery proceeding pending in Tarrant County, Texas. Respondent moved to have the subpoena quashed. When his motion was denied, he immediately moved for a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases