KRYGOSKI CONST. CO., INC. v. CITY OF MENOMINEE

No. 2:04-cv-076.

431 F.Supp.2d 755 (2006)

KRYGOSKI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., a Michigan Corporation, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MENOMINEE, a Michigan municipal corporation, and Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Northern Division.

May 5, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael J. Palid, Marinette, WI, Stephen Michael Ryan, Stephen M. Ryan PLLC, Bingham Farms, MI, for Plaintiff.

Dean F. Pacific, Daniel P. Lennington, Warner Norcross & Judd LLP, Ronald M. Stella, U.S. Attorney, Grand Rapids, MI, David Plotinsky, U.S. House of Representatives, Office of the General Counsel, Washington, DC, for Defendants.


MEMORANDUM

EDGAR, District Judge.

This is an action for cost recovery under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601-9675 ("CERCLA") and the Michigan Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act, Mich. Comp. Laws §§ 324.20101 et seq. ("NREPA"). Plaintiff Krygoski Construction Company, Inc. ("Krygoski") seeks recovery of its alleged response costs pursuant to Section 107...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases