Ronald PETERSON, et al., Respondents,
v.
BASF CORPORATION, a foreign corporation, Appellant.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 30, 2006.
March 30, 2006.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
James A. O'Neal, John P. Borger, Winthrop A. Rockwell, Bruce Gregory Jones, John P. Mandler, Faegre & Benson LLP, Minneapolis, MN; and Kenneth F. Johannson, Crookston, MN, for Appellant BASF Corp.
Hugh V. Plunkett, III, Scottsdale, AZ; and J. Michael Schwartz, Minneapolis, MN, for Respondent Ronald Peterson.
Douglas J. Nill, Minneapolis, MN, for Respondents Barry Thune and Christopher Grove Farms and Ronald Peterson.
Wayne D. Struble, Bowman and Brooke, Minneapolis, MN, for Amicus The Product Liability Advisory Council, Inc.
Lawrence S. Ebner, McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP, Washington, DC, for Amicus CropLife America.
Evan M. Tager, Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw LLP, and Robin S. Conrad, Washington, DC, for Amicus Chamber of Commerce of the United States.
Todd Anders Noteboom, Leonard Street & Deinard, Minneapolis, MN, for Amicus National Assoc. of Independent Insurers.
Michael Robert Docherty, Minneapolis, MN, for Amicus Tort Reform Association and Amicus American Tort Reform Association.
William F. Mohrman, Mohrman & Kaardal, P. A., Minneapolis, MN, for Amicus Washington Legal Foundation.
Scott W. Johnson, Minneapolis, MN, for Amicus National Assoc. of Manufacturers/American Chemistry.
Mike Hatch, Attorney General, Prentiss Edward Cox, St. Paul, MN, for Amicus Minnesota Attorney General.
Bruce Michael Kleven, ST. Paul, MN, for Amicus American Sugarbeet Growers Association.
J. Gordon Rudd, Jr., Zimmerman Reed PLLP, Minneapolis, MN, for Amicus Minnesota Trial Lawyers Association.
David Ryan Moeller, Farmers Legal Action Grp. Inc., St. Paul, MN, for Amicus Minnesota Farmers Union.
Heard, considered and decided by the court en banc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
OPINION
ANDERSON, RUSSELL A., Chief Justice.
In February 2004, we affirmed the judgment for respondents Ronald Peterson, et al., in this class action against appellant BASF Corporation for violation of the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act ("NJCFA"), N.J. Stat. Ann. §§ 56:8-1 to -106 (West 2001), in BASF's marketing and advertising of its herbicides Poast and Poast Plus. Peterson v. BASF Corp.,675 N.W.2d 57
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
