1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 462 F.3d
  5. 462 F.3d 708 (2006)
 

U.S. v. CUNNINGHAM

No. 05-1515, 05-1632, 05-1633.

462 F.3d 708 (2006)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Herman CUNNINGHAM, Larry D. Williams, Sr., a/k/a "L," and David Hardin, a/k/a Big Dave, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided August 29, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joshua J. Minkler (argued), Office of The United States Attorney, Indianapolis, IN, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Michael D. Sher (argued), Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellant, Herman Cunningham.

Tina Schneider (argued), Portland, ME, for Defendant-Appellant, Larry D. Williams, Sr.

William E. Marsh (argued), Indiana Federal Community Defenders, Inc., for Defendant-Appellant, David Hardin.

Before FLAUM, Chief Judge, and POSNER and KANNE, Circuit Judges.

KANNE, Circuit Judge.

After a jury trial, Herman Cunningham, Larry Williams, and David Hardin were convicted of conspiracy to commit various drug offenses involving the distribution of heroin in Indianapolis, Indiana. See 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846, 860(a), 861(f). Hardin was also convicted of possession with intent to distribute heroin and of being a felon in possession of a firearm.1 See 21 U.S.C. § 841...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases