RESEARCH IN MOTION LIMITED, et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
VISTO CORPORATION, Defendant.
United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
October 19, 2006.
October 19, 2006.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
George W. Bramblett, Jr., John Russell Emerson, Phillip Brett Philbin, Haynes & Boone, Dallas, TX, Jamie H. Mcdole, Linda S. Debruin, Michael A. Parks, William E. Devitt, Kirkland & Ellis, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiffs.
Sam F. Baxter, Gary S. Kitchen, Martin C. Robson, Theodore Stevenson, III, William E. Davis, III, McKool Smith, Dallas, TX, Greg Travis Warder, Imran Khaliq, J. Bruce McCubbrey, Michelle Gillette, Robert D. Becker, Ronald S. Katz, Shawn G. Hansen, Manatt Phelps & Phillips, Palo Alto, CA, for Defendant.
United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
FITZWATER, District Judge.
Defendant Visto Corporation ("Visto") moves to dismiss one of these consolidated actions for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiffs Research in Motion Limited ("RIML") and Research in Motion Corporation ("RIMC") move under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) to transfer the cases to the Eastern District of Texas for the convenience of the parties...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.