CONDITIONED OCULAR ENHANCEMENT v. BONAVENTURA

No. 05 C 2153.

458 F.Supp.2d 704 (2006)

CONDITIONED OCULAR ENHANCEMENT, INC. and Fasttrack Baseball Corp., Plaintiffs, v. Michael BONAVENTURA, Jill Bonaventura, Craig Hallgren, Thomas Davidson, and Chi-Town Express, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

October 17, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Matthew S. Miller, Robert D. Sweeney, Miller & Sweeney LLC, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiffs.

Daniel Patrick Hogan, Jason Matthew Leo, McCabe & Hogan, Palatine, IL, John P. Luther, Jenkens & Gilchrist, Chicago, IL, Thomas K. Mirabile, Wheaton, IL, for Defendants.

Craig Hallgren, Park Ridge, IL, pro se.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ZAGEL, District Judge.

I. BACKGROUND

This case arises out of Defendant Michael Bonaventura's assignment of United States Patent No. 6,447,408 (the "`408 Patent") to Plaintiff Conditioned Ocular Enhancement, Inc. ("COE"). Upon learning that Defendant Thomas Davidson ("Davidson") was providing vision training services that COE believed to be the patented Ocular Enhancement Training System, COE brought an action...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases