1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 137 P.3d
  5. 137 P.3d 1021 (2006)
 

MUMFORD v. MILLER

No. 32061.

137 P.3d 1021 (2006)

143 Idaho 99

Mark MUMFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Cynthia L. MILLER and Janice L. Smith-Hill, as individuals, and Miller, Smith-Hill & Associates, Defendants-Respondents.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, May 2006 Term.

May 25, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mabbutt & Mumford, Moscow, for appellant. Mark Mumford argued.

Miller, Smith-Hill & Associates, Moscow, for respondents.

JONES, Justice.

After being denied attorney fees in arbitration, the appellant sought relief in district court. The district judge declined to make an award of attorney fees and we affirm his order.

I.

Respondents Cynthia L. Miller and Janice L. Smith-Hill operated a law firm in Moscow, Idaho. Appellant Mark Mumford contracted with the Miller, Smith-Hill law firm in March 2002.1 Under the contract, Mumford would provide...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases