PER CURIAM.
Respondent, Danny Ray Hill, has failed on multiple occasions to meet his obligation, as required by Ind. Admission and Discipline Rule 23 § 10(a)(2), to respond to Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission demands for information in connection with grievances filed against him. By order dated September 12, 2005, we suspended respondent indefinitely as a result of his lack of cooperation. As a result of yet another failure to respond to an order...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.