PER CURIAM.
Appellant seeks reversal of an order continuing his involuntary commitment for mental illness. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that he suffers from a mental disorder or that, as a result of a mental disorder, he is presently a danger to others. The state concedes that the evidence is insufficient to establish that defendant is dangerous to others and that the judgment should be reversed. On de novo...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
