1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 29 A.D.3d
  5. 29 A.D.3d 1098 (2006)
 

IN THE MATTER OF HANTZ v. BRIGHTMAN AGENCY

29 A.D.3d 1098 (2006)

816 N.Y.S.2d 199

In the Matter of the Claim of MILDRED HANTZ, Respondent, v. BRIGHTMAN AGENCY et al., Respondents, and SPECIAL FUND FOR REOPENED CASES, Appellant. WORKERS' COMPENSATION BOARD, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

May 11, 2006.

Mercure, J.P.

Claimant, a registered nurse, suffered a compensable back injury in November 1993. Because she lost no time from work, no award of compensation was directed, symptomatic treatment was authorized and the case was closed in April 1994. Although claimant received chiropractic treatment on a regular basis through June 2004, no medical narratives explaining a change in her condition were submitted by her chiropractor...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases