1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 902 A.2d
  5. 902 A.2d 222 (2006)
 

TLUMAC v. HIGH BRIDGE STONE

902 A.2d 222 (2006)

187 N.J. 567

James E. TLUMAC, Petitioner-Respondent, v. HIGH BRIDGE STONE, Respondent-Appellant.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided July 19, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert N. Golden, Bridgewater, argued the cause for appellant (Golden, Rothschild, Spagnola, Lundell, Levitt & Boylan, attorneys).

Craig Voorhees, Somerville, argued the cause for respondent (Lieberman, Ryan & Forrest, attorneys).

Justice WALLACE, JR. delivered the opinion of the Court.

Petitioner James Tlumac was seriously injured in a tractor-trailer accident at work and sought workers' compensation benefits. His employer, respondent High Bridge Stone (High Bridge), asserted the statutory defense of intoxication. The compensation judge found that petitioner's intoxication was not the sole cause of the accident and awarded benefits to petitioner....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases