RANDOLPH v. REISIG

Docket No. 259943.

727 N.W.2d 388 (2006)

272 Mich. App. 331

E. Richard RANDOLPH and Betty J. Randolph, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Clarence E. REISIG, Monica Reisig, William Hinkley, and Debra Hinkley, Defendants-Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Michigan.

Decided October 3, 2006, at 9:00 a.m.

Released for Publication January 5, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Warner Norcross & Judd L.L.P. (by John G. Cameron, Jr.; John J. Bursch and Daniel P. Lennington), Grand Rapids, for E. Richard and Betty J. Randolph.

Timmis & Inman P.L.L.C. (by Joseph M. Xuereb), Detroit, for Clarence E. and Monica Reisig.

Before: SAWYER, P.J., and FITZGERALD and O'CONNELL, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appeal as right the order granting defendants' motion for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(10) in this dispute arising out of the interpretation of covenants contained in a property owners' association agreement. We reverse and remand.

We review de novo a trial court's decision on a motion for summary disposition. A motion for summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(10) tests the factual support of a claim. Rice v. Auto...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases