1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 898 A.2d
  5. 898 A.2d 193 (2006)
 

DIXON v. BROMSON AND REINER

No. 26338.

898 A.2d 193 (2006)

95 Conn.App. 294

Sandra A. DIXON v. BROMSON AND REINER.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decided May 9, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert A. Serafinowicz, with whom was John R. Williams, New Haven, for the appellant (plaintiff).

Ralph W. Johnson III, with whom, on the brief, was Thomas J. Hagarty, Jr., Hartford, for the appellee (defendant).

DiPENTIMA, GRUENDEL and PETERS, Js.

GRUENDEL, J.

In this legal malpractice action, the plaintiff, Sandra A. Dixon, appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendant law firm, Bromson & Reiner. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly concluded that expert testimony was necessary to show (1) the standard of proper professional care and (2) that the defendant's alleged breach of its duty of care proximately caused the plaintiff's alleged loss...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases