1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 128 P.3d
  5. 128 P.3d 947 (2006)
 

SADIKU v. AATRONICS INC.

No. 31295.

128 P.3d 947 (2006)

142 Idaho 410

Bashkim SADIKU, Claimant-Appellant, v. AATRONICS INCORPORATED, Employer, and Idaho State Insurance Fund, Surety, Defendants-Respondents.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, January 2006 Term.

January 25, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sadiku Bashkim, appellant pro se.

Ellis, Brown & Sheils, Chtd., Boise, for respondents. Max M. Sheils, Jr. argued.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the Industrial Commission's denial of the claimant's motion to set aside a lump sum agreement entered into between the surety and the claimant. The Commission found that the claimant had failed to prove fraud and refused to set aside the agreement. We affirm.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In January 2001, Bashkim Sadiku underwent back surgery. In July 2002, he filed a claim seeking benefits under the Worker's...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases