1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 858 N.E.2d
  5. 858 N.E.2d 208 (2006)
 

BRILES v. WAUSAU INS. COMPANIES

No. 10A04-0605-CV-244.

858 N.E.2d 208 (2006)

Daniel BRILES, Appellant-Petitioner, v. WAUSAU INSURANCE COMPANIES, Appellee-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Indiana.

December 12, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Diane E. Bluhm, Bubalo & Hiestand, PLLC, Louisville, KY, Attorney for Appellant.

James L. Fischer, Jr., Boehl Stopher & Graves, LLP, New Albany, IN, Attorney for Appellee.

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Appellant-Petitioner, Daniel V. Briles (Briles), appeals the trial court's denial of his Motion to Correct Error contending that the trial court erred by concluding in its declaratory judgment that Appellee-Respondent, Wausau Insurance Companies (Wausau), is not obligated to provide coverage under the terms of its insurance policy.

We affirm.

ISSUE

Briles raises...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases