1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 458 F.3d
  5. 458 F.3d 606 (2006)
 

U.S. v. WALLACE

No. 05-3675.

458 F.3d 606 (2006)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Darryl WALLACE, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided August 14, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edmond E. Chang, James Barz (argued), Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Sergio F. Rodriguez (argued), Office of the Federal Defender Program, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before CUDAHY, KANNE, and WOOD, Circuit Judges.

WOOD, Circuit Judge.

In this appeal, we again confront the question of the proper approach to appellate review of the reasonableness of a federal sentence. Appellant Darryl Wallace pleaded guilty to wire fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1343. Despite the fact that the Sentencing Guidelines advise that a term between 24 and 30 months is appropriate for Wallace, the district court judge decided that the reasonable sentence for Wallace...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases