1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 38 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 38 Cal.Rptr.3d 67 (2006)
 

ARP PHARMACY v. GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES

Nos. B179537, B181354.

38 Cal.Rptr.3d 67 (2006)

ARP PHARMACY SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

January 17, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The Law Offices of Armond Marcarian, Armond Marcarian; The Law Offices of Janet R. Randle and Janet R. Randle for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Jones Day, Steven B. Katz, John S. Sasaki, Los Angeles, and Sue J. Stott, San Francisco, for Defendants and Respondents.

EPSTEIN, P.J.

In this case, we conclude that the reporting requirement in Civil Code section 2527 violates the free speech rights of prescription drug claims processors. We also conclude the court properly granted respondents' special motion to strike and did not abuse its discretion in the award of attorney fees.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL SUMMARY

Section 2527, subdivision (b)1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases