OPINION AND ORDER
FORESTER, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on cross motions for summary judgment by Plaintiffs [DE # 57] and the Defendant [DE# 58]. Having been fully briefed, these motions are ripe for review.
The four Plaintiffs claim that a change in their pension plan from a traditional defined benefit plan to a cash balance plan violated § 204(b)(1)(H), the anti-age discrimination...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
