Carl Pigford appeals the summary denial of his rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief, in which he alleges that his trial counsel was ineffective. We affirm the rulings of the trial court in all respects save one. With respect to the claim in which Mr. Pigford contends that his defense counsel was ineffective in failing to request that the jury be instructed in accordance with Chicone v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PIGFORD v. STATE
No. 5D05-3570.
935 So.2d 93 (2006)
Carl PIGFORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
August 4, 2006.
August 4, 2006.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Carl Pigford, Madison, pro se.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
