1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 138 P.3d
  5. 138 P.3d 889 (2006)
 

IN THE MATTER OF MARRIAGE OF PIERCE AND PIERCE

01-DS-0123; A126585.

138 P.3d 889 (2006)

206 Or. App. 699

In the Matter of the MARRIAGE OF Caryl A. PIERCE, nka Caryl A. Jamison, Appellant-Cross-Respondent, and Milton C. Pierce, Respondent-Cross-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided July 5, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nancy A. Borneman argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent. With her on the briefs was Dutli & Borneman, LLP, Pineville.

Ellen Krider, Prineville, argued the cause for respondent-cross-appellant. With her on the brief were J.C. Van Voorhees and Van Voorhees & Krider.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and BREWER, Chief Judge, and PRATT, Judge pro tempore.

PRATT, J. pro tempore.

Wife appeals after the trial court vacated the property provisions of a stipulated judgment of dissolution of marriage and entered a new judgment for the division of the parties' marital property pursuant to ORCP 71 C.1 The trial court also granted husband's motion to reduce the amount of child support payable to wife as part of a modification proceeding. Wife makes four assignments of error. Husband cross-appeals...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases