ESSER v. RAINBOW ADVERTISING SALES CORP.

No. 05 Civ. 3703(WCC).

448 F.Supp.2d 574 (2006)

Peter ESSER, Plaintiff, v. RAINBOW ADVERTISING SALES CORP. d/b/a Cablevision Advertising Sales, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

September 13, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sapir & Frumkin LLP, William D. Frumkin, Esq., Kathryn E. White, Esq., of Counsel, White Plains, NY, Attorneys for Plaintiff.

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP, Barbara E. Hoey, Esq., Damon W. Suden, Esq., Kevin J. Smith, Esq., of Counsel, New York, NY, Attorneys for Defendant.


OPINION AND ORDER

WILLIAM C. CONNER, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiff Peter Esser brings this action against Rainbow Advertising Sales Corp. d/b/a Cablevision Advertising Sales ("RACO") for interference and retaliation under 29 U.S.C. §§ 2614 and 2615 of the Family and Medical Leave Act ("FMLA"). Defendant moves for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons stated herein, defendant's motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases