PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Joshua Arthur, challenges the summary denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). In his motion, appellant contends his sentences are illegal where he was sentenced in case numbers 96-257 and 99-177 under unconstitutional 1995 guidelines and where he committed his crimes during the relevant window period.
Appellant's claim is premised on Heggs v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.