Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiff's motion for a judgment upon the defendants' default in answering and granting the defendants' cross motion to extend their time to answer and to compel the plaintiff to accept their late answer (see Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md. v. Andersen & Co.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.