1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 872 A.2d
  5. 872 A.2d 120 (2005)
 

HALBACH v. BOYMAN

872 A.2d 120 (2005)

377 N.J. Super. 202

Russell HALBACH, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Christopher BOYMAN and Boyman & Associates, P.C., Defendants-Appellants. Christopher Boyman and Boyman & Associates, P.C., Defendants-Appellants/Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. Mary Thurber, Esq., The Law Offices of Mary Thurber and Thurber Cappell, LLC, Third-Party Defendants.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 3, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Scott D. Samansky argued the cause for appellants (Fishman & Callahan, attorneys; Mr. Samansky, on the brief).

Robert A. Vort, Hackensack, argued the cause for respondent.

Before Judges WEFING, PAYNE and C.S. FISHER.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

WEFING, P.J.A.D.

We granted defendants Christopher Boyman and Boyman & Associates, P.C. ("Boyman") leave to appeal from a trial court order directing Boyman to answer certain questions posed in his deposition and rejecting his contention that the questions improperly sought material protected under the work product doctrine enunciated in R. 4:10-2(c). Having reviewed the record in light of the contentions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases