AMMERMAN v. HAUDEN

No. 2003AP2249.

281 Wis.2d 709 (2005)

2005 WI 79

698 N.W.2d 609

John R. AMMERMAN, Robert L. Klein and Brian G. Sumption, Plaintiffs, ROI INVESTMENTS, Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner, v. Paddy A. HAUDEN and Susan A. Scholl, Defendants-Respondents-Cross Petitioners.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided June 17, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff-appellant-petitioner there were briefs by George B. Strother, IV, Kristin J. Sederholm and Krekeler Strother, S.C., Madison, and oral argument by George B. Strother.

For the defendants-respondents-cross petitioners there were briefs by Andrew W. Erlandson and Hurley, Burish & Milliken, S.C., Madison, and oral argument by Andrew W. Erlandson.


¶ 1. PER CURIAM.

We dismiss the petition and cross-petition for review as improvidently granted.

¶ 2. Plaintiff, ROI Investments, petitioned, and defendants, Paddy Hauden and Susan Scholl, cross-petitioned this court for review of an unpublished decision of the court of appeals which affirmed in part and reversed in part the circuit court's judgment of $303,523.15 on counterclaims related to a failed real...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases