1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 362 S.C.
  5. 362 S.C. 614 (2005)
 

DIXON v. FORD

No. 3934.

362 S.C. 614 (2005)

608 S.E.2d 879

Raymond Capers DIXON, Robert Marshall Dixon and Kirsten Dixon, Appellants, v. Clinton Karl FORD, Jimmy F. Hughes, Jr., d/b/a J & D Pest Control, Defendants, Of whom Clinton Karl Ford is the Respondent.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina.

Decided January 31, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth R. Young, Jr. and Edgar R. Donald, Jr., both of Sumter, for Appellants.

M.M. Weinberg, Jr., of Sumter, for Respondent.

ANDERSON, J.:

Raymond Capers Dixon, Robert Marshall Dixon, and Kirsten Dixon (the Dixons) purchased a house from Clinton Ford. After the sale, the Dixons discovered substantial termite damage to the house. The Dixons initiated this action, and a verdict was rendered for Ford. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

FACTUAL/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Ford acquired a house at 9 Loring Mill Road as investment property, which he eventually decided to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases