STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
James Hubert TUCKER, Jr., Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Wisconsin.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Oral argument December 7, 2004.
Decided April 21, 2005.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
For the defendant-appellant-petitioner there were briefs and oral argument by Donald T. Lang, assistant state public defender.
For the plaintiff-respondent the cause was argued by James M. Freimuth, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was Peggy A. Lautenschlager, attorney general.
An amicus curiae brief was filed by Walter Dickey, David E. Schultz, Michael E. Smith and Cecelia M. Klingele, University of Wisconsin Law School, Madison, on behalf of the University of Wisconsin Law School, and oral argument by Walter Dickey.
Supreme Court of Wisconsin.
¶ 1. N. PATRICK CROOKS, J.
James Hubert Tucker, Jr. (Tucker) seeks review of an order of the court of appeals, affirming the circuit court's denial of his motion for sentence modification under Wis. Stat. § 809.30(2)(h) (2001-02).1 We review this case to determine whether the reductions in maximum penalties for the crimes of possession with...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
