Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from an order of Family Court modifying an order of the Hearing Examiner that was entered upon the consent of the parties. Respondent thereafter filed objections with the court seeking to vacate the order of the Hearing Examiner. Even assuming, arguendo, that the court was empowered to review an order of the Hearing Examiner entered by consent (see Matter of Culton v Culton,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
IN THE MATTER OF McADAMS v. PINCKNEY
15 A.D.3d 955 (2005)
789 N.Y.S.2d 581
In the Matter of DAVID R. McADAMS, Appellant, v. JULIE PINCKNEY, Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
February 4, 2005.
February 4, 2005.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.