MILLER v. GINSBERG


874 A.2d 93 (2005)

Kimberly MILLER and Roy Miller, h/w, Appellants v. Phillip C. GINSBERG, D.O. and Suburban Urological Associates, Appellees. Kimberly Miller and Roy Miller, h/w, Appellees v. Howard G. Altman, M.D., Urological Associates, P.C., Phillip C. Ginsberg, D.O., Suburban Urological Associates and Simindokht Dadparvar, M.D. Appeal of Phillip C. Ginsberg, D.O. and Suburban Urological Associates.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Filed April 14, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gayle Lewis, Bryn Mawr, for Miller.

Frank A. Gerolamo III, Philadelphia, for Ginsberg.

Before: GANTMAN, PANELLA, and OLSZEWSKI, JJ.


OLSZEWSKI, J.

¶ 1 Phillip Ginsberg, D.O. and Suburban Urological Associates (appellees with regard to the order of June 24, 2004, and appellants with regard to the judgment of June 25, 2004), hereinafter "defendants," and Kimberly and Roy Miller (appellants with regard to the order of June 24, 2004, and appellees with regard to the judgment of June 25, 2004), hereinafter "plaintiffs," challenge the lower court rulings in this matter. Plaintiffs claim that the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases