KARLOCK v. WASTE MANAGEMENT OF ILLINOIS

Nos. 3-04-0649, 3-04-0655.

839 N.E.2d 128 (2005)

361 Ill. App.3d 992

298 Ill.Dec. 141

Merlin KARLOCK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WASTE MANAGEMENT OF ILLINOIS, County Board of Kankakee County, and the Illinois Pollution Control Board, Respondents-Appellees. Michael Watson, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Waste Management of Illinois, County Board of Kankakee County, and the Illinois Pollution Control Board, Respondents-Appellees.

Appellate Court of Illinois, Third District.

November 11, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George Mueller (argued), Ottawa, for Merlin Karlock.

Jennifer J. Sackett Pohlenz (argued), David E. Neumeister, Megan A. Brynes, Querrey & Harrow, Ltd., Chicago,

Lisa Madigan, Attorney General, Gary S. Feinerman, Solicitor General, Karen J. Dimond (argued), Assistant Attorney General, Chicago, for Illinois Pollution Control Board.

Donald J. Moran (argued), Pedersen & Houpt, Chicago, for Waste Management of Illinois.

Edward D. Smith, State's Attorney, Kankakee, Charles F. Helsten, Richard S. Porter, Heather K. Lloyd, Hinshaw & Culbertson, Rockford, Elizabeth S. Harvey, Swanson, Martin & Bell, Chicago, for Kankakee County Board.

Christopher W. Bohlen, Barmann, Bohlen & Woodruff, Kankakee, Keith Runyon, Bourbonnais, Kenneth A. Bleyer, Chicago, for Appellee.


Justice SCHMIDT delivered the opinion of the court:

This is an appeal of the Illinois Pollution Control Board's (IPCB) denial of Merlin Karlock's and Michael Watson's motions to intervene in Waste Management of Illinois' (Waste Management) appeal to the IPCB of the Kankakee County Board's (KCB) denial of Waste Management's second site location application to expand its landfill located in Kankakee County.

BACKGROUND

On September 26, 2003, Waste Management...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases