1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 36 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 36 Cal.Rptr.3d 901 (2005)
 

STEWART v. PRESTON PIPELINE INC.

No. H028333.

36 Cal.Rptr.3d 901 (2005)

134 Cal.App.4th 1565

Darren STEWART, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. PRESTON PIPELINE INC. et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District.

December 20, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Scott Seabaugh, Law Offices of Scott Seabaugh, San Jose, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

William S. Caspari, Alameda, Fortune, Drevlow, O'Sullivan & Hudson, for Defendants and Respondents.

DUFFY, J.

As an encouragement to the open communication essential to successful settlement discussions, the Evidence Code, and in particular Evidence Code section 1119 (section 1119),1 makes inadmissible any statements, writings, or other communications made in connection with mediation. We consider here whether this broad mediation confidentiality statute may be used by a settling party...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases