1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 867 A.2d
  5. 867 A.2d 66 (2005)
 

PITTS v. DeCOSTA

No. 24862.

867 A.2d 66 (2005)

87 Conn.App. 605

Kyle D. PITTS et al. v. Joao M. DeCOSTA.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decided February 22, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William F. Gallagher, with whom, on the brief, was Hugh D. Hughes, for the appellants (plaintiffs).

David S. Monastersky, with whom, on the brief, was Daniel C. DeMerchant, Hartford, for the appellee (defendant).

DRANGINIS, BISHOP and MIHALAKOS, Js.

MIHALAKOS, J.

The plaintiff Kyle D. Pitts1 appeals from the judgment for the defendant, Joao M. DeCosta, that was rendered by the trial court on a verdict that was directed in the defendant's favor. Specifically, Pitts argues that the court improperly denied his request to amend the substitute complaint to add an additional claim based on strict liability pursuant to General Statute § 29-402(c)(2).2 The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases