McLAUGHLIN v. HEIKKILA

No. A04-1906.

697 N.W.2d 231 (2005)

David M. McLAUGHLIN, et al., Appellants, v. Wilbert R. HEIKKILA, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

June 7, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Laurence J. Klun, Klun Law Firm, P.A., Ely, MN, for appellants.

Scott C. Neff, Paul D. Cerkvenik, The Trenti Law Firm, Virginia, MN, for respondent.

Donald D. Smith, Christopher P. Renz, Thomsen & Nybeck, P.A., Edina, MN, for amicus curiae The Minnesota Association of Realtors.

Considered and decided by STONEBURNER, Presiding Judge; HUDSON, Judge; and DIETZEN, Judge.


OPINION

DIETZEN, Judge.

Appellants brought this action for specific performance of a contract to purchase respondent's real estate. The district court determined that no contract had been formed between the parties and granted respondent's motion to dismiss. Because we see no error of law in the dismissal, we affirm.

FACTS

On August 15, 2003, respondent Wilbert Heikkila signed an agreement with Kangas Realty to sell eight parcels of Heikkila...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases