1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 617 S.E.2d
  5. 617 S.E.2d 306 (2005)
 

COKER v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORP.

No. COA04-523.

617 S.E.2d 306 (2005)

James and Charlotte COKER, Robert and Rebecca Darconte, and Donald and Bonita Shoe, Plaintiffs, v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, Defendant.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

August 16, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mauriello Law Offices, by Christopher D. Mauriello; and Wallace and Graham, PA, by Marc P. Madonia, Salisbury, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Smith Moore LLP, by Sidney S. Eagles, Jr. and Allison O. Van Laningham; and Bush Seyferth Kethledge & Paige PLLC, by Raymond M. Kethledge, Troy, Michigan, pro hac vice, for defendant-appellee.

TYSON, Judge.

James and Charlotte Coker, Robert and Rebecca Darconte, and Donald and Bonita Shoe (collectively, "plaintiffs") appeal order granting judgment on the pleadings to DaimlerChrysler Corporation ("defendant"). We affirm.

I. Background

On 8 May 2001, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint against defendant as owners of model years 1995 through 2000 minivans manufactured by defendant. These...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases