1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 29 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 29 Cal.Rptr.3d 894 (2005)
 

UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA v. SUPERIOR COURT

No. A107553.

29 Cal.Rptr.3d 894 (2005)

130 Cal.App.4th 378

UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA, N.A., Petitioner, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of Alameda County, Respondent; Grafton Partners, L.P., et al., Real Parties in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

June 17, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nixon Peabody LLP, Paul J. Hall, Eric K. Larson and James D. Griffioen, San Francisco, for Petitioner.

Ernest C. Barrett, III and Manpreet Singh, Washington, DC, for Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Bartko, Zankel, Tarrant & Miller, John J. Bartko and Christopher J. Hunt, San Francisco, for Real Parties in Interest.

McGUINESS, P.J.

National banks are required to file a suspicious activity report (SAR) with the federal government whenever they detect a known or suspected violation of federal law or a suspicious transaction related to money laundering. (12 C.F.R. § 21.11(a) (2005).) SAR's are confidential. (12 C.F.R. § 21.11(k) (2005).) Under federal law, national banks that are subpoenaed or otherwise requested to produce...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases