1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 125 P.3d
  5. 125 P.3d 786 (2005)
 

FREEMAN v. STUART

0307-07393; A126215.

125 P.3d 786 (2005)

203 Or. App. 191

Shirley W. FREEMAN and SKF Trust and Pension, Inc., Respondents, v. Charles L. STUART, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 14, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter R. Chamberlain, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Andrew D. Glascock and Bodyfelt Mount Stroup & Chamberlain, LLP.

Jennie L. Clark argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents.

Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and ORTEGA, Judge, and HULL, Judge pro tempore.

LANDAU, P.J.

This is a personal injury case arising out of an automobile accident. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff.1 Defendant appeals, arguing that the trial court should not have sent the case to the jury and that, instead, it should have granted a motion for summary judgment on the ground that defendant was not properly served. We conclude that defendant's assignment of error is not reviewable and therefore affirm.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases