CARPINELLO, J.
Following arbitration of respondent's New Car Lemon Law claim, an arbitrator found in his favor and directed petitioner to refund him more than $30,000. In this CPLR article 75 proceeding to vacate this award, petitioner argued, and Supreme Court agreed, that the arbitrator applied an improper interpretation to General Business Law § 198-a (d) (1) in determining that respondent was entitled to relief under the statute.
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.