David R. CHAPMAN et al., Petitioners,
v.
The SUPERIOR COURT of San Diego County, Respondent;
David Malcolm, Real Party in Interest.
Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 15, 2005.
Review Denied August 31, 2005.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Duane E. Bennett; Richards, Watson & Gershon, Darold D. Pieper, Gregory M. Kunert, Los Angeles; Coughlan, Semmer & Lipman, R.J. Coughlan, Jr., Cathleen G. Fitch and Earll M. Pott, San Diego, for Petitioners.
Jennifer B. Henning for California State Association of Counties as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Petitioners.
Manuela Albuquerque, Berkeley, for the League of California Cities as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Petitioner, the San Diego Port District.
No appearance for Respondent.
Stanford & Associates, Dan L. Stanford, San Diego, Jora J. Zulauf; Law Office of Charles Sevilla, Charles M. Sevilla, San Diego, for Real Party in Interest.
Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.
McCONNELL, P.J.
Government Code1 section 1090 prohibits an officeholder from having a financial interest in any contract made by the public agency of which he or she is a member. Section 1090 is intended to protect the public agency's interests and those of its constituency by assuring undivided loyalty and allegiance, removing direct and...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
