1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 21 A.D.3d
  5. 21 A.D.3d 857 (2005)
 

PEOPLE v. TINGLING

21 A.D.3d 857 (2005)

801 N.Y.S.2d 323

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MARIO TINGLING, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

September 29, 2005.

The court properly exercised its discretion in admitting the uncharged crimes evidence challenged by defendant on appeal since it went directly to the issue of whether defendant knowingly advanced or profited from prostitution, as required by Penal Law § 230.30. We do not find this evidence to be cumulative or unduly prejudicial (see People v. Alvino, 71 N.Y.2d 233

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases