1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 30 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 30 Cal.Rptr.3d 841 (2005)
 

FLORIO v. CITY OF ONTARIO

No. E036598.

30 Cal.Rptr.3d 841 (2005)

130 Cal.App.4th 1462

April FLORIO, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CITY OF ONTARIO, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two.

Review Denied October 26, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Filarsky & Watt and Steve A. Filarsky, Ojai, for Defendant and Appellant.

Lackie & Dammeier, Dieter C. Dammeier, Michael A. Morguess and Michael A. McGill, Upland, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

GAUT, J.

1. Introduction

The City of Ontario appeals a judgment in favor of April Florio. Florio, a former Ontario employee, challenged a provision of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the city and the San Bernardino Public Employees Association (SBPEA) requiring the city and the employee share equally the cost of a hearing officer in an employee's appeal. The trial court held the cost-sharing provision was unconstitutional...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases