1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 36 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 36 Cal.Rptr.3d 833 (2005)
 

CATHEDRAL CITY REDEVELOPMENT v. STICKLES

No. E036456.

36 Cal.Rptr.3d 833 (2005)

CATHEDRAL CITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Sam STICKLES, Individually and as Trustee, etc. et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District, Division Two.

December 19, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The Law Office of Martin Lax and Martin Lax, Palm Desert, for Defendants and Appellants.

Oliver, Vose, Sandifer, Murphy & Lee and James Duff Murphy, Los Angeles, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

KING, J.

INTRODUCTION

In this quick take eminent domain proceeding, defendants and appellants1 appeal from a judgment in favor of respondent, Cathedral City Redevelopment Agency (CCRA), condemning appellants' three residential rental properties for redevelopment purposes. We affirm the judgment.

In quick take eminent domain proceedings, the date of valuation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases